Sunday, November 09, 2008

Second viewing thoughts and grade report: Notre Dame

This wasn’t an overall “A” performance, but watching it back I felt better about our offense. In fact everything looked pretty good on the second viewing.

Offense: B-

Crane’s passing numbers look terrible. But it wasn’t as bad as 9 for 22 appears. By my count he only had five really bad throws. Two of those could have been INTs that would have changed the game. They weren’t though, so we can just say Crane got a bit lucky. Only two true drops. What I did appreciate about Crane’s day – especially when we were ahead – he made pretty good decisions on tucking and running. If he is going to make bad decisions, I’d rather have it happen during a run than a pass. As for his designed runs, I felt he was overly cautious on the QB option runs. They were there for most of the night. Overall, Crane was ok. He needs to play better though if we are to make something of this stretch run.

The offensive line played really well. As a group they dominated in both aspects of the game. Castonzo: flawless. His assignments never even got close to the action. Ramsey had another excellent game. We had a lot of good holes and openings on their side of the ball. Tennant had the snaps under control. He also did an excellent job blocking. The only gripe with Tennant was the stupid personal foul he got for shoving. My whipping boys Claiborne and Lapham were much, much better. My only problem with their play was the false start penalties that hurt drives.

Comparing Harris and Haden is inevitable given their stature, age, and recruiting hype. It is really not fair since at the end of the day they are both freshmen with promising futures. At this point Harris is ahead in his development. He’s shown great vision, cutback ability and balance in prior games. Last night he showed surprising strength. Multiple times he fought through the first contact and added a few yards. He also did a good job in blitz pick up. Haden wasn’t as explosive and got tripped up a few times. McCluskey wasn’t as involved as past weeks. He also got hurt late in the game. Word is his season is over.

Although he only caught two passes, this might have been Ryan Purvis’ best game of the year. Both catches were sure-handed and in heavy traffic. He also did a good job blocking. His fellow Tight End Lars Anderson did not catch a ball but blocked well. Robinson’s TD catch was a great route and great concentration. However, he dropped the long fly pattern that would have really given us a boost. Gunnell played well although his blocking on Crane’s runs was a bit suspect. Jarvis only had one catch.

Although we didn’t put up many points, I wasn’t unhappy with the game Logan called. We stuck with the run which played to our strengths (the line). We didn’t put Crane in bad situations. We tested them a few times downfield. My only complaint was going so conservative in the red zone. We tried to pound it in and only really threw into the endzone three times. With our inability to kick a field goal, we might as well treat it as four down territory and use the fades to Momah more.

Defense: A

The defensive line deservedly received most of the attention on the broadcast. Raji was a monster. He was moving past his blockers at will and even started shoving them into ND’s playmakers. Brace didn’t get the pub but he played very well too. Giles and Ramella made some plays and did a good job with contain. However, they both had stupid penalties. Of the second teamers, Scafe stood out. Like Brace and Raji, Scafe did a great job blasting off the line. Rossi played well. Ramsey and Newman also played well in limited minutes.

The linebackers played very well. No missed tackles and great pass coverage. Francois is doing a good job as Toal’s replacement. Herzy was very good. McLaughlin also had a strong game. One thing Blackledege pointed out (which is why he is one of the best Color guys) is McLaughlin’s strong fundamentals. For example McLaughlin engaged and bumped Rudolph before the first INT. It was Thompson’s failure to bump Spiller last week in a similar play that led to a big TD play. The second team guys didn’t get many snaps.

The secondary played much better than I ever expected. Fletcher was excellent considering who he was going up against. He was disciplined and showed a great tackling. Plus his final pick sealed the day. Rollins had his best game in weeks and also did a good job in all aspects of corner play. Gause got challenged a few times and wisely decided to commit pass interference when he was burned. Johnson got playing time but wasn’t really challenged. He did make good tackle though. Wes Davis also had one of his better games. He was good in run support, forced a fumble and helped stop the few long completions that ND had. Anderson was excellent. In addition to his two picks he also broke up a few other plays and was in position all night. He’s really come into his own this year. Akins was also very good. He was used to attack Clausen. He also batted a ball and chased Clausen out of bounds a few times.

Spaz called a very good game. Clausen never knew what was coming. In fact, we didn’t even blitz much in the second half as ND abandoned the run and Clausen had trouble with seven (or more) in coverage. Another sign that we scouted them well: the batted balls (six at least). Guys were ready and timing Clausen perfectly. Spaz or someone picked on Clausen’s low release on the tape and obviously made it a point of emphasis.

Special teams: B-

Steve Aponavicius was bad. A change needs to be made. Not much else to say.

On Smith’s one kick return he was a little slow starting and didn’t do much with it. The blocking appeared better.

Gunnell has been very good as a punt returner. He makes good decisions on fair catches and he had another nice runback last night.

Our punt blocking is Beamer-esque. It’s well designed and uses the right guys. I don’t know why the other special team units have so much trouble.

The kick coverage was better although still not great. Quigley got off good kicks. The tackling was better but I would still like to see a little more speed on the unit.

Loved Flutie’s rugby kick. It was effective and I think he got robbed on one of his spots.

Overall: B+

The best thing about the game is that is stopped the bleeding. A three game slide would have been a real mental hole and would have made the Jags bandwagon very lonely. As I mentioned, the confusion of Clausen, the ability to run the ball and the punt block all showed that the staff was ready for this game. They helped outcoach the "genius" on the other sidelines. Jags job is also to push the emotional buttons. For what it is worth, the guys seemed confident despite the two losses. Beating Notre Dame never gets old, however, this season will be remembered by how we play in the next three weeks. Let's hope we end with a bang.

7 comments:

bobble said...

I agree the play calling was better, but I wish Purvis was more involved in the offense. He is one of the best tight ends in the ACC and he was such an important piece last year.
Also I wish Logan found better ways to get Haden, Harris, and Gunnell (our top playmakers) the ball with space to run. Especially against an agressive defense like ND I was waiting for a screen pass to expose that.
Just my opinion.

morrina said...

If you are looking for an intangible that was a key to victory, Sam Quigley is it. We were amazed at the depth of his kickoffs (the best of anyone all year), and his punts were spectacular, often times changing field position. He deserves a shot at field goals....please!

Andrew S. said...

Even if the season doesn't end the way we all hope it will, it's still good to beat our rivals. I particularly liked hearing the story of how early in the week, Jags asked all of those on the team to raise their hand if they had been recruited by ND, and of course nobody did. I'd imagine Weis's future as ND's HC is on some shifty ground right now.

Really have to hand it to the defense- they were hungry and smart... the way they blocked for Anderson's pick 6 is what really stood out for me.

eaglephile said...

Very unfortunate to see McCluskey out for the season - he is a tough player who has been reliable in short yardage situations and was a nice option for Crane in check-down situations.

Any idea who we'll see replace him? Beok is listed as the backup FB, but he seems pretty small for run blocking situations. Maybe Dan Williams or Will Thompson will be converted? I suppose we are fortunate to have 2 solid HBs in Haden and Williams, as our offense does not rely much on 2 back sets.

Eagle1 said...

Overall, a great job by the team. Save for a special lap dance in Vegas, nothing is better than beating ND, and even if we do not win another game for the rest of the season (knock on wood), I still will be semi-content because of this victory alone. I was at ND in '93, and some of you younger guys just don't understand the level of ND arrogance that we dealt with back then. These victories are sweeter than you can imagine. Super-kudos to Quigley. He averaged 40 yards per punt, and that last one was a thing of extreme beauty. Not to appear to be focusing on the negative, but one does not get better without doing so:

1. Running plays. Is it me, or do we seem like a one-trick pony? It's that QB option over and over and over again. Is there nothing else in the running-play bag of tricks? Where is the Logan genius and creativity? Every game, I look at our monster linemen, and each guy appears to be a foot taller and at least 75 lbs. heavier than the guy across from him. We should be crushing on the ground, and we are not. I don't get it.

I agree re: Crane's decision-making on the options. There seemed to be at least two or three plays to the right side in the second half that, if he had kept the ball, he was gone, potentially for six.

2. Aponabench. I'd rather see Raji, Brace, or the new Flutie statue kick field goals. This guy's head is now Jello, and it's over. He couldn't kick around an idea at this point. If someone looked at the BC stats, I'd be shocked if his for 2008 weren't the worst of all time. Enough is enough. The emotional let-down that these missed kicks must have on the team cannot be overstated. As for their effect on fans, every time he kicks, 200 alcoholics are born. Thank you for '06, Steve. Time to take a seat and be happy with your scholarship.

3. Penalties. Nine for 90 yards. Totally unacceptable. We are not good enough to give yards away like this. Penalties are a sign of mental weakness, and I place the blame for this on the shoulders of the coaches. Time for a little more Coughlin-esqe discipline.

eagleboston said...

I attended the game at Alumuni and it was a great night. Here are my thoughts:

1) I go to at least one game each year and the crowd for the ND game was the best I have ever seen at Alumni. They showed up on time and the students were phenomenal. Whoever started the Superfans needs a medal as the students are much more into it than we losers were in the late 80's. They even stayed long after the game singing along with the band. Kudos students!

2) Offense played very conservatively. Notre Dame consistently put 8-9 guys in the box and I think we could have gone over the top for some explosive plays, but I'm guessing Logan and Company did not want to make game-changing mistakes. Even Notre Dame's anemic offense out-gained BC.

3) Herzy in person is simply amazing. He was all over the field and plays with reckless abandon. He's the best BC linebacker since Boyd.

4) BC has not lost a game that I attended since 2000 in South Bend. I wish I didn't live 1500 miles away.

5)Quigly's punts were incredible considering the weather. He booted BC out of several holes.

6) Given the fact BC has trouble with speed (UNC and Clemson)I just don't see how we beat Florida State on the road. But, I think we have an excellent chance against both Wake and Maryland to finish 8-4, exactly where I thought we would finish pre-season.

Go BC! Just 3 more weeks!

Nick P. said...

ALT, I think you're being a little generous with the B- special teams grade. Even considering Quigley's kicking and punting and the blocked punt, I wouldn't give them more than a C-.

The field goal kicking was probably the worst I've seen it ever at BC.

The punt return team. My god, the punt return team's blocking! It was horrible. It amazes me that we ever actually get to do anything but fair catch the ball because we do an absolutely terrible job of blocking their gunners. I don't think we blocked the other teams' gunners once all season. The last game was no different.

The kickoff return coverage unit looked shakey as well.

I feel like Jags has complete overlooked the special teams third of the game.